We trace hidden assets, quantify damages, and unwind fraud — then turn the findings into testimony that holds up under cross-examination. Our partners have been retained on more than 600 matters and have never had a report excluded for methodology.
Retained by litigators, regulators, and boards across North America
Plaintiff or defence, civil or regulatory, boardroom or courtroom — we are retained for the question that decides the case: where did the money go, and how much was lost?
We follow funds through shell entities, nominee accounts, and offshore layers until they resolve to a beneficial owner — and we document every hop so the trail survives a Mareva motion.
Embezzlement, kickback schemes, channel-stuffed revenue, cooked financial statements. We reconstruct what the perpetrator spent months trying to erase.
Lost profits, business valuation, and disgorgement models built on assumptions we can defend line by line — not numbers reverse-engineered to a target.
Expert witnesses who teach the trier of fact, concede the fair point, and do not break on cross. The calm voice in the room is usually ours.
Income reconstruction and hidden-asset analysis for high-conflict separations and oppression claims — where one side has had years to bury the balance.
Quiet, privileged work for audit committees and counsel responding to a regulator — scoped to find the answer before anyone else has to.
Three decades of findings that held
Anyone can produce a number. We produce a number that an opposing expert cannot dismantle — because the method, the data, and the chain of custody are documented from the first engagement letter.
Every model follows accepted forensic and valuation standards, with assumptions disclosed and stress-tested against the alternatives before opposing counsel does it for us.
Source documents are imaged, hashed, and logged at intake, so the evidentiary record is unbroken from production to the witness stand.
We write so a judge or juror grasps the finding on first reading — conclusions up front, the heavy schedules in an appendix that survives scrutiny.
Transaction timelines and flow-of-funds visuals your trial team can put on a screen, walk a juror through, and defend without an asterisk.
Anonymized to protect privilege. Every figure below was put in front of a court, a tribunal, or a regulator — and stood.
$48M routed out of a family business through six nominee entities across four jurisdictions. We rebuilt the path, named the beneficial owner, and supported the Mareva injunction that froze it.
A pre-acquisition target inflating sales with round-trip invoices. Our reconstruction cut the valuation by 40% and turned a closing into a rescission claim.
A spouse drawing a modest salary and living on a private company's expense account. Income reconstruction restated true earnings at 3.6x the reported figure.
Profits earned on undisclosed related-party trades. We modelled the ill-gotten gain the regulator could actually collect — and defended the number through settlement.
“Their expert was the calmest person in the room during cross. The methodology was airtight and the opposing expert knew it. We settled the next morning.”
“We thought the money was gone. Redfern traced it through three layers we never would have found and handed us an exhibit a jury could actually follow.”
“The report read like it was written for the judge, not for us — conclusions up front, every schedule defensible. That is rarer in this field than it should be.”
Most matters begin with a scoping assessment. From there we structure the engagement around the stage your case is in — not a package you'll outgrow by discovery.
Before you commit to litigation.
Investigation through report.
When you need an expert on the stand.
We run a conflict check within one business day. For active litigation, we can have a partner reviewing documents that same week and a preliminary view shortly after.
Our methodology is built to accepted forensic and valuation standards, with every assumption disclosed and tested. In more than 600 matters, no Redfern report has been excluded for methodology.
Yes. We are retained by plaintiffs and defendants, claimants and respondents, regulators and boards. Our findings follow the evidence, not the party that engaged us — and that is precisely why they hold.
Source materials are imaged, hashed, and logged from intake. We work under counsel's privilege where appropriate and maintain an unbroken evidentiary record all the way to the stand.
No. We scope each engagement to the dispute in front of us. The fixed-fee scoping assessment exists precisely so a smaller matter gets a proportionate starting point and an honest read.
Send the facts under privilege. We will run a conflict check, tell you candidly whether we can help, and scope the work before you spend a dollar on analysis.